United States v. Rader
This text of 487 F. App'x 98 (United States v. Rader) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Randy Scott Rader appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his sentence and its subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rader, No. 1:04-cr-00071-JPJ-1 (W.D.Va. July 23, 2012 & Aug. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [99]*99presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
487 F. App'x 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rader-ca4-2012.