United States v. Rader

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 24, 2010·No. 098242·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8242

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RANDY SCOTT RADER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (1:04-cr-00071-jpj-1)

Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 24, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy Scott Rader, Appellant Pro Se. Zachary T. Lee, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Randy Scott Rader appeals the district court’s order

denying his 28 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for a reduction in

sentencing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Rader, No. 1:04-cr-00071-jpj-1

(W.D. Va. Nov. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rader, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Rader (United States v. Rader) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 3582
28 U.S.C. § 3582