United States v. Rader
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8242
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RANDY SCOTT RADER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (1:04-cr-00071-jpj-1)
Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 24, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randy Scott Rader, Appellant Pro Se. Zachary T. Lee, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Randy Scott Rader appeals the district court’s order
denying his 28 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for a reduction in
sentencing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Rader, No. 1:04-cr-00071-jpj-1
(W.D. Va. Nov. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Rader (United States v. Rader) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.