United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Company, Inc., and United Pacific Insurance Company
Opinion
57-1 USTC P 9269
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
R. F. BALL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Inc., and United Pacific
Insurance Company, Appellees.
No. 16276.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 26, 1956.
A. F. Prescott, George F. Lynch, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., Russell B. Wine, U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex.
Elmer J. Kelsey, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., John N. Stull, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Harman Parrott, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for appellant.
Richard U. Simon, Ft. Worth, Tex., Josh H. Groce, San Antonio, Tex., Eskridge, Groce & Hebdon, San Antonio, Tex., of counsel, for appellee.
Before CAMERON, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The facts of this case are well recited and the controlling principles of law are well stated in the opinion of Judge Rice, R. F. Ball Construction Company v. Jacobs, D.C., 140 F.Supp. 60. For the reasons there set forth the judgment appealed from is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
239 F.2d 384 (United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Company, Inc., and United Pacific Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.