United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Company, Inc., and United Pacific Insurance Company
This text of 239 F.2d 384 (United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Company, Inc., and United Pacific Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
57-1 USTC P 9269
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
R. F. BALL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Inc., and United Pacific
Insurance Company, Appellees.
No. 16276.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 26, 1956.
A. F. Prescott, George F. Lynch, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., Russell B. Wine, U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex.
Elmer J. Kelsey, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., John N. Stull, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Harman Parrott, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for appellant.
Richard U. Simon, Ft. Worth, Tex., Josh H. Groce, San Antonio, Tex., Eskridge, Groce & Hebdon, San Antonio, Tex., of counsel, for appellee.
Before CAMERON, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The facts of this case are well recited and the controlling principles of law are well stated in the opinion of Judge Rice, R. F. Ball Construction Company v. Jacobs, D.C., 140 F.Supp. 60. For the reasons there set forth the judgment appealed from is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 F.2d 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-r-f-ball-construction-company-inc-and-united-pacific-ca5-1956.