United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Co.
239 F.2d 384
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 26, 1956·No. No. 16276·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
The facts of this case are well recited and the controlling principles of law are well stated in the opinion of Judge Rice, R. F. Ball Construction Company v. Jacobs, D.C., 140 F.Supp. 60. For the reasons there set forth the judgment appealed from is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Co., 239 F.2d 384 (5th Cir. 1956).
239 F.2d 384 (United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. L. C. Chapman
281 F.2d 862 (Tenth Circuit, 1960)
Gauvey v. Basin Rig & Trucking, Inc.
185 F. Supp. 374 (D. North Dakota, 1960)
United States v. V. F. Bond, Audrey A. Bond
279 F.2d 837 (Fourth Circuit, 1960)
Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Antonelli Construction Co.
173 F. Supp. 391 (D. Massachusetts, 1959)
Mason City and Clear Lake R. Co. v. Imperial Seed Co.
152 F. Supp. 145 (N.D. Iowa, 1957)
United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Company, Inc., and United Pacific Insurance Company
239 F.2d 384 (Fifth Circuit, 1956)