United States v. Quinones-Garcia
Opinion
MEMORANDUM2
Juan Quinones-Garcia appeals his conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, and sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Relying on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Quinones-Garcia contends that the district court erred when it increased his base offense level by 16 points, because the fact that his prior deportation followed an aggravated felony conviction was neither admitted nor proven beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury. He further contends that Apprendi calls into question the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). QuinonesGarcia’s contentions, however, are foreclosed by our recent decision in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 413-14 (9th Cir.2000), as amended (Feb.8, 2001).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
7 F. App'x 593 (United States v. Quinones-Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.