United States v. Quinones-Garcia

7 F. App'x 593
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 22, 2001
DocketNo. 99-50110; D.C. No. CR-98-00898-HLH-1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 F. App'x 593 (United States v. Quinones-Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Quinones-Garcia, 7 F. App'x 593 (9th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

Juan Quinones-Garcia appeals his conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, and sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Relying on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Quinones-Garcia contends that the district court erred when it increased his base offense level by 16 points, because the fact that his prior deportation followed an aggravated felony conviction was neither admitted nor proven beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury. He further contends that Apprendi calls into question the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). QuinonesGarcia’s contentions, however, are foreclosed by our recent decision in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 413-14 (9th Cir.2000), as amended (Feb.8, 2001).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lopez-Ruiz v. United States
534 U.S. 847 (Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 F. App'x 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-quinones-garcia-ca9-2001.