United States v. Quick

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6869

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MELVIN QUICK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:96-cr-00134-FDW-6)

Submitted: March 8, 2011 Decided: March 21, 2011

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin Quick, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Melvin Quick appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Quick,

No. 3:96-cr-00134-FDW-6 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 2009). We deny

Quick’s pending motion to compel the district court to rule on

his § 3582(c)(2) motion and his motion for transfer to a

handicapped accessible facility. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED