United States v. Quick

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 18, 2003
• Docket: 02-6252
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

S. Ct. order filed 3/17/03; case is vacated and remanded Petition for cert granted by order filed 3/10/03; opinion filed 6/24/02 is vacated UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6252

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MELVIN QUICK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-96-134, CA-01-58-3-W-V)

Submitted: June 12, 2002 Decided: June 24, 2002

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin Quick, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Melvin Quick seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Quick, Nos. CR-96-134; CA-01-

58-3-W-V (W.D.N.C. filed Nov. 26, 2001 & entered Nov. 28, 2001).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED