United States v. Quick

74 M.J. 223
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedJanuary 30, 2015
DocketNo. 15-0347/MC
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 74 M.J. 223 (United States v. Quick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Quick, 74 M.J. 223 (Ark. 2015).

Opinion

CCA 20201300341. Notice is hereby given that a certificate for review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals was filed under Rule 22 on this date on the following issue:

WHETHER PRECEDENT AUTHORIZING COURTS OF CRIMINAL APPEALS TO ORDER SENTENCE-ONLY REHEARINGS SHOULD BE OVERRULED BASED ON (A) JACKSON v. TAYLOR, 353 U.S. 569 (1957), WHICH STATED “NO [SUCH] AUTHORITY” EXISTS; (B) THE PLAIN LANGUAGE OF THE STATUTE INCLUDING THE CONJUNCTIVE “FINDINGS AND SENTENCE” IN ARTICLE 66(d) IN CONTRAST TO AUTHORITY GRANTED THE JUDGE ADVOCATES GENERAL IN ARTICLE 69(a) TO ACT WITH RESPECT TO “FINDINGS AND SENTENCE OR BOTH” AND THE CONVENING AUTHORITY IN ARTICLE 60(f)(3) TO ORDER SENTENCE REHEARINGS; AND (C) JUDICIAL ECONOMY.

Appellant will file a brief under Rule 22(b) in support of said certificate on or before March 2, 2015.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Quick
74 M.J. 332 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 M.J. 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-quick-armfor-2015.