United States v. Quattlebaum
This text of 643 F. App'x 308 (United States v. Quattlebaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Furman Benjamin Quattlebaum appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See United States v. Quattlebaum, No. 3:02-cr-00548-CMC-17 (D.S.C. Sept. 14, 2015; filed Sept. 30, 2015, entered Oct. 1, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
643 F. App'x 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-quattlebaum-ca4-2016.