United States v. Quattlebaum

643 F. App'x 308
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 6, 2016·No. No. 15-7663·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Furman Benjamin Quattlebaum appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See United States v. Quattlebaum, No. 3:02-cr-00548-CMC-17 (D.S.C. Sept. 14, 2015; filed Sept. 30, 2015, entered Oct. 1, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Quattlebaum, 643 F. App'x 308 (4th Cir. 2016).

643 F. App'x 308 (United States v. Quattlebaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Furman Quattlebaum
696 F. App'x 625 (Fourth Circuit, 2017)