United States v. Pugh

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 21, 2002
• Docket: 02-7133
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7133

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HARRY PUGH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CR-99-41, CA-00-210-5)

Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 21, 2002

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry Pugh, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Gerald Nazzaro, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Harry Pugh seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and conclude for the reasons

stated by the district court that Pugh has not made a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States

v. Pugh, Nos. CR-99-41; CA-00-210-5 (N.D.W. Va. June 24, 2002).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED