United States v. Prince

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Prince

624 F. App'x 833

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2015·No. No. 15-7291·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Charles Prince appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012) motion and denying Prince’s motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Vaughn, 806 F.3d 640, 644-45 (1st Cir.2015). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the [834] district court. United States v. Prince, No. 2:06-cr-00012-HCM-TEM-1 (E.D.Va. June 2, 2015 & July 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Charles Prince appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012) motion and denying Prince’s motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Vaughn, 806 F.3d 640, 644-45 (1st Cir.2015). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the [834] district court. United States v. Prince, No. 2:06-cr-00012-HCM-TEM-1 (E.D.Va. June 2, 2015 & July 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Prince, 624 F. App'x 833 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

624 F. App'x 833 (United States v. Prince) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related