United States v. Price

282 F. App'x 277
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Price. Read the opinion of the Court — 164 F. App'x 404
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 26, 2008·No. Nos. 08-6018, 08-6539·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Willie Freno Price appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004) (motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the district court”). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Price, 282 F. App'x 277 (4th Cir. 2008).

282 F. App'x 277 (United States v. Price) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Anthony Goines
357 F.3d 469 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)