United States v. Powell

312 F. App'x 204
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 12, 2009·No. No. 08-13991·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Stacy Powell appeals his resentencingunder 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Although the district court reduced Powell’s sentence for his crack cocaine conviction under Amendment 706 of the ' sentencing guidelines, it denied Powell’s request to reduce his sentence further under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Powell con[205] tends that the district court erred in failing to apply Booker at his resentencing.

Recently this circuit joined the Eighth, Fourth, and Tenth Circuits in holding that Booker does not apply at resentencing proceedings under § 3582(c)(2). United States v. Melvin, 556 F.3d 1190 (11th Cir.2009); see also United States v. Starks, 551 F.3d 839 (8th Cir.2009); United States v. Dumphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009); United States v. Rhodes, 549 F.3d 833 (10th Cir.2008). There was no error at the resentencing.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Powell, 312 F. App'x 204 (11th Cir. 2009).

312 F. App'x 204 (United States v. Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Melvin
556 F.3d 1190 (Eleventh Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Rhodes
549 F.3d 833 (Tenth Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Dunphy
551 F.3d 247 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Starks
551 F.3d 839 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)