United States v. Powell

312 F. App'x 204
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedFebruary 12, 2009
DocketNo. 08-13991
StatusPublished

This text of 312 F. App'x 204 (United States v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Powell, 312 F. App'x 204 (11th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Stacy Powell appeals his resentencingunder 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Although the district court reduced Powell’s sentence for his crack cocaine conviction under Amendment 706 of the ' sentencing guidelines, it denied Powell’s request to reduce his sentence further under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Powell con[205]*205tends that the district court erred in failing to apply Booker at his resentencing.

Recently this circuit joined the Eighth, Fourth, and Tenth Circuits in holding that Booker does not apply at resentencing proceedings under § 3582(c)(2). United States v. Melvin, 556 F.3d 1190 (11th Cir.2009); see also United States v. Starks, 551 F.3d 839 (8th Cir.2009); United States v. Dumphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009); United States v. Rhodes, 549 F.3d 833 (10th Cir.2008). There was no error at the resentencing.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Melvin
556 F.3d 1190 (Eleventh Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Rhodes
549 F.3d 833 (Tenth Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Dunphy
551 F.3d 247 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Starks
551 F.3d 839 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
312 F. App'x 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-powell-ca11-2009.