United States v. Pool

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Pool

659 F.3d 761, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 19260, 2011 WL 4359899

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 19, 2011·No. No. 09-10303·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

ORDER

We have been advised that Pool has entered a guilty plea. The parties agree there is no longer a live controversy, and the case is moot. See In re Pattullo, 271 F.3d 898, 900 (9th Cir.2001) (“If a case becomes moot while pending on appeal, it must be dismissed.”). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal, vacate the panel’s opinion, vacate the district court’s and magistrate judge’s orders and remand with instructions to dismiss the action. See United [762] States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

The oral argument set for September 20, 2011 in San Francisco, California is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

We have been advised that Pool has entered a guilty plea. The parties agree there is no longer a live controversy, and the case is moot. See In re Pattullo, 271 F.3d 898, 900 (9th Cir.2001) (“If a case becomes moot while pending on appeal, it must be dismissed.”). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal, vacate the panel’s opinion, vacate the district court’s and magistrate judge’s orders and remand with instructions to dismiss the action. See United [762] States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

The oral argument set for September 20, 2011 in San Francisco, California is vacated.

United States v. Pool, 659 F.3d 761, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 19260, 2011 WL 4359899 (9th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

659 F.3d 761 (United States v. Pool) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related