United States v. Poidevien

610 F. App'x 933
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 17, 2015·No. No. 15-10560·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Adler, appointed counsel for Ralphe Poidevien, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738; 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Poidevien has filed a [934] motion for leave to file a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw and Anders brief out of time. Poidevien’s motion is GRANTED, however, our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Therefore, because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Poidevien’s motion to reduce sentence, filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), is AFFIRMED. Furthermore, in light of the foregoing, Poide-vien’s motion to dismiss appointed counsel, grant him leave to proceed on appeal pro se, and to be provided with a copy of the record on appeal is DENIED AS MOOT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Poidevien, 610 F. App'x 933 (11th Cir. 2015).

610 F. App'x 933 (United States v. Poidevien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)