United States v. Poidevien
This text of 610 F. App'x 933 (United States v. Poidevien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert Adler, appointed counsel for Ralphe Poidevien, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738; 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Poidevien has filed a [934]*934motion for leave to file a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw and Anders brief out of time. Poidevien’s motion is GRANTED, however, our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Therefore, because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Poidevien’s motion to reduce sentence, filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), is AFFIRMED. Furthermore, in light of the foregoing, Poide-vien’s motion to dismiss appointed counsel, grant him leave to proceed on appeal pro se, and to be provided with a copy of the record on appeal is DENIED AS MOOT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
610 F. App'x 933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-poidevien-ca11-2015.