United States v. Plater
This text of United States v. Plater (United States v. Plater) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7135
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ANGELO ALBERT PLATER,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:97-cr-00408-PJM-1)
Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 22, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sapna Mirchandani, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Deborah A. Johnston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, Barbara Slaymaker Sale, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Angelo Albert Plater appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United
States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Plater, No. 8:97-cr-00408-PJM-1 (D. Md. filed
June 24, 2008; entered June 25, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Plater, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-plater-ca4-2009.