United States v. Pitt

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Pitt

100 F. App'x 890

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 14, 2004·No. No. 03-7876·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Donte Javon Pitt appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Pitt, No. CR-96-36-AW (D.Md. Nov. 13, 2003). We deny Pitt’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Donte Javon Pitt appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Pitt, No. CR-96-36-AW (D.Md. Nov. 13, 2003). We deny Pitt’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Pitt, 100 F. App'x 890 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

100 F. App'x 890 (United States v. Pitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related