United States v. Pitt

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 14, 2004
• Docket: 03-7876
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7876

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DONTE JAVON PITT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CR-96-36-AW)

Submitted: May 24, 2004 Decided: June 14, 2004

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fred Warren Bennett, Michael E. Lawlor, BENNETT AND LAWLOR, LLP, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Bonnie S. Greenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Donte Javon Pitt appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See United States v. Pitt, No. CR-96-36-AW (D.

Md. Nov. 13, 2003). We deny Pitt’s motion for oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -