United States v. Pipefitters Local Union No. 562, Etc.

434 F.2d 1127
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 17, 1970·No. 19466·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

On June 8,1970, the conviction of Pipe-fitters Local Union No. 562, Lawrence L. Callanan, John L. Lawler and George Seaton on a charge of conspiracy under 18 U.S.C.A. § 371 to violate 18 U.S.C.A. § 610, which makes it unlawful for a labor organization to make a contribution or expenditure in connection with any election to federal office, was affirmed by a panel of this court consisting of Judges Van Oosterhout, Blackmun and Heaney. Judge Heaney filed a dissent. The opinion is reported at 434 F.2d 1116.

Thereafter on August 19, 1970, a rehearing in banc was granted by a majority vote of the active judges of this court and the judgment affirming the conviction was vacated and set aside. The court in banc on October 14, 1970, heard this case.

The judgments of conviction and sentences imposed are affirmed for the reasons set out in the panel majority opinion filed June 8, 1970. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Pipefitters Local Union No. 562, Etc., 434 F.2d 1127 (8th Cir. 1970).

434 F.2d 1127 (United States v. Pipefitters Local Union No. 562, Etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Labor's Educational & Political Club-Independent v. Danforth
561 S.W.2d 339 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1978)
United States v. Chestnut
394 F. Supp. 581 (S.D. New York, 1975)
Lewis v. Baxley
368 F. Supp. 768 (M.D. Alabama, 1973)
Abbott v. Thetford
354 F. Supp. 1280 (M.D. Alabama, 1973)
Pipefitters Local Union No. 562 v. United States
407 U.S. 385 (Supreme Court, 1972)
United States v. Boyle
338 F. Supp. 1028 (District of Columbia, 1972)
United States v. Pipefitters Local Union No. 562, Etc.
434 F.2d 1127 (Eighth Circuit, 1970)
Marcus Laverne Sherburne v. United States
433 F.2d 1350 (Eighth Circuit, 1970)