United States v. Phillips

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 16, 1998·No. 98-6733·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6733

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TAURUS DOUGLAS PHILLIPS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-95-786, CA-97-1837-4-22)

Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 16, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Taurus Douglas Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Phillips, Nos. CR-95-786; CA-97-1837-4-22

(D.S.C. Apr. 8, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Phillips, (4th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Phillips (United States v. Phillips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related