United States v. Phillips

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 28, 1996·No. 96-6152·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6152

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SYLVESTER CLIFFORD PHILLIPS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CR-93-6, CA-95-278-1)

Submitted: March 5, 1996 Decided: March 28, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sylvester Clifford Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. John Castle Parr, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis-

trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Phillips, Nos. CR-93-6; CA-95-278-1 (S.D.W. Va. Jan 12, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Phillips, (4th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Phillips (United States v. Phillips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related