United States v. Phillips
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6152
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
SYLVESTER CLIFFORD PHILLIPS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CR-93-6, CA-95-278-1)
Submitted: March 5, 1996 Decided: March 28, 1996
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sylvester Clifford Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. John Castle Parr, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis-
trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Phillips, Nos. CR-93-6; CA-95-278-1 (S.D.W. Va. Jan 12, 1996). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Phillips (United States v. Phillips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.