United States v. Phillip Williams

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 18, 2014
• Docket: 13-4615
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-4615

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

PHILLIP JAMES WILLIAMS, a/k/a D, a/k/a PJ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (4:09-cr-00073-TLW-1)

Submitted: January 30, 2014 Decided: February 18, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Russell Warren Mace, III, THE MACE FIRM, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, for Appellant. William N. Nettles, United States Attorney, Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Phillip James Williams appeals the district court’s

judgment in a criminal case pursuant to the Fair Sentencing Act.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See

United States v. Williams, 4:09-cr-00073-TLW-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 16,

2013); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012); United States v.

Black, 737 F.3d 280, 286-87 (4th Cir. 2013); United States v.

Fraley, 988 F.2d 4, 6-7 (4th Cir. 1993); Fed. R. Crim. P. 35.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED