United States v. Phillip Evans
This text of United States v. Phillip Evans (United States v. Phillip Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6780 Doc: 7 Filed: 10/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6780
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PHILLIP EUGENE EVANS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:19-cr-00356-D-4)
Submitted: October 10, 2024 Decided: October 16, 2024
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip Eugene Evans, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6780 Doc: 7 Filed: 10/16/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Phillip Eugene Evans appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. After reviewing the record, we conclude
that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Evans’ motion. See United
States v. Spruhan, 989 F.3d 266, 269 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Evans,
No. 5:19-cr-00356-D-4 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Phillip Evans, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-phillip-evans-ca4-2024.