United States v. Pettry
This text of 115 F. App'x 231 (United States v. Pettry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Emory Allen Pettry appeals his sentence following a guilty plea conviction for *232 possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, and manufacturing an unregistered firearm. Pettry argues that the district court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines by enhancing his offense level for manufacturing an unregistered firearm on the basis that Pettry manufactured the firearm in connection with another felony offense. Pettry argues that the sentence enhancement is erroneous in light of U.S.S.G. § 2K2.4, comment, (n.4), because his sentence for manufacturing a firearm is to be served consecutively to his sentence for using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime.
Pettry’s sentence for manufacturing an unregistered firearm was not enhanced based on his use of a firearm, but because he manufactured the device in connection with the felony offense of manufacturing methamphetamine. Accordingly, we find no error in the district court’s sentencing determination. United States v. Washington, 340 F.3d 222, 230-31 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1081, 124 S.Ct. 942, 157 L.Ed.2d 757 (2003).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *232 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 F. App'x 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pettry-ca5-2004.