United States v. Peterson

United States Court of Military Appeals

United States v. Peterson

17 C.M.A. 548, 17 USCMA 548, 38 C.M.R. 346, 1968 CMA LEXIS 258, 1968 WL 5415

CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals

DecidedMay 17, 1968

DocketNo. 20,837

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 17 C.M.A. 548 (United States v. Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Peterson, 17 C.M.A. 548, 17 USCMA 548, 38 C.M.R. 346, 1968 CMA LEXIS 258, 1968 WL 5415 (cma 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Ferguson, Judge:

Tried by general court-martial convened at Camp Martin Cox, Vietnam, the accused pleaded' guilty to involuntary manslaughter and five specifications of assault with a dangerous weapon, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 119 and Article 128, 10 USC §§ 919, 928, respectively. He was found guilty and sentenced to bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement at hard labor for five years, and reduction. Pursuant to the terms of a pretrial agreement, the convening authority reduced the term of adjudged imprisonment to two years, but otherwise approved the sentence. The board of review affirmed, and we granted accused’s petition for review upon the assertion that his pleas of guilty were rendered improvident inasmuch as they were based upon the erroneous assumption that the offenses alleged were separately punishable when, in fact, they were not.

Basically, the facts indicate accused, engaged in horseplay, threw a fragmentation grenade toward a company shower point. ’ As a result of its impact with the ground, the grenade armed itself and exploded. One soldier was killed, and five others were injured. Based on these facts, appellate defense counsel, relying on Bell v United States, 349 US 81, 99 L Ed 905, 75 S Ct 620 (1955), and Ladner v United States, 358 US 169, 3 L Ed 2d 199, 79 S Ct 209 (1958), urge that, as all injuries resulted from a single grenade explosion, the offenses alleged were not separately punishable, even [549]*549though involving violence against different victims.

For the reasons set forth in United States v Parker, 17 USCMA 545, 38 CMR 343, this day decided, we disagree and conclude, in the case of offenses against the person, each homicide and assault against a different victim is a separately punishable crime. The maximum punishment imposable extended, therefore, among other things, to confinement at hard labor for eighteen years. Assuming, then, that multiplicity may affect the providence of guilty pleas, there was no such factor present here.

The decision of the board of review is aifirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Kil-day concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of the Court

Ferguson, Judge:

Tried by general court-martial convened at Camp Martin Cox, Vietnam, the accused pleaded' guilty to involuntary manslaughter and five specifications of assault with a dangerous weapon, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 119 and Article 128, 10 USC §§ 919, 928, respectively. He was found guilty and sentenced to bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement at hard labor for five years, and reduction. Pursuant to the terms of a pretrial agreement, the convening authority reduced the term of adjudged imprisonment to two years, but otherwise approved the sentence. The board of review affirmed, and we granted accused’s petition for review upon the assertion that his pleas of guilty were rendered improvident inasmuch as they were based upon the erroneous assumption that the offenses alleged were separately punishable when, in fact, they were not.

Basically, the facts indicate accused, engaged in horseplay, threw a fragmentation grenade toward a company shower point. ’ As a result of its impact with the ground, the grenade armed itself and exploded. One soldier was killed, and five others were injured. Based on these facts, appellate defense counsel, relying on Bell v United States, 349 US 81, 99 L Ed 905, 75 S Ct 620 (1955), and Ladner v United States, 358 US 169, 3 L Ed 2d 199, 79 S Ct 209 (1958), urge that, as all injuries resulted from a single grenade explosion, the offenses alleged were not separately punishable, even [549]*549though involving violence against different victims.

For the reasons set forth in United States v Parker, 17 USCMA 545, 38 CMR 343, this day decided, we disagree and conclude, in the case of offenses against the person, each homicide and assault against a different victim is a separately punishable crime. The maximum punishment imposable extended, therefore, among other things, to confinement at hard labor for eighteen years. Assuming, then, that multiplicity may affect the providence of guilty pleas, there was no such factor present here.

The decision of the board of review is aifirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Kil-day concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 C.M.A. 548, 17 USCMA 548, 38 C.M.R. 346, 1968 CMA LEXIS 258, 1968 WL 5415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-peterson-cma-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack