United States v. Peterson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Peterson. Read the opinion of the Court — 629 F.3d 432
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2008·No. 08-7254·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7254

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TRACEY DEVON PETERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:99-cr-00116-JBF-8)

Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 17, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tracey Devon Peterson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tracey Devon Peterson appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. United States v. Peterson, No.

2:99-cr-00116-JBF-8 (E.D. Va. June 24, 2008). We deny

Peterson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Peterson, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Peterson (United States v. Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related