United States v. Peters

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Peters. Read the opinion of the Court — 392 F. App'x 161
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 27, 2010·No. 09-7503·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7503

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

IVORY PETERS, JR., a/k/a Buster,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cr-00203-REP-6)

Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 27, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ivory Peters, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ivory Peters, Jr., appeals the district court's order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Peters, No. 3:06-cr-00203-REP-6 (E.D. Va. July 22,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Peters, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Peters (United States v. Peters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related