United States v. Perry Shippy
Opinion
Perry Roger Shippy appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Shippy, No. 1:09-cr-00023-MR-DLH-10 (W.D.N.C. May 28, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
582 F. App'x 221 (United States v. Perry Shippy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.