United States v. Perry Shippy

582 F. App'x 221
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Perry Shippy. Read the opinion of the Court — 471 F. App'x 172
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 26, 2014·No. 14-6888·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Perry Roger Shippy appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Shippy, No. 1:09-cr-00023-MR-DLH-10 (W.D.N.C. May 28, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Perry Shippy, 582 F. App'x 221 (4th Cir. 2014).

582 F. App'x 221 (United States v. Perry Shippy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related