United States v. Perry

100 F. App'x 540
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Perry. Read the opinion of the Court — 228 F. App'x 557
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided June 14, 2004·No. No. 03-6415·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The defendant filed an appeal of his conviction of conspiracy to utter counterfeit obligations and possession and production of counterfeit obligations with intent to defraud. The government advises the court that the defendant died on March 26, 2004, and moves for a remand. See Fed. R.App. P. 43(a)(1) (upon the filing of a suggestion of death the court “may then direct appropriate proceedings”). Counsel for the defendant concurs in the motion to remand.

When a criminal defendant dies while his direct appeal is pending, the case abates and the action must be remanded to the district court for dismissal of the indictment. See United States v. Wilcox, 783 F.2d 44 (6th Cir.1986) (order); United States v. Toney, 527 F.2d 716, 720 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 838, 97 S.Ct. 107, 50 L.Ed.2d 104 (1976). Therefore, the motion to remand is GRANTED, the judgment is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED to the district court with instructions to dismiss the indictment upon the filing of a death certificate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Perry, 100 F. App'x 540 (6th Cir. 2004).

100 F. App'x 540 (United States v. Perry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Oscar Toney, Jr.
527 F.2d 716 (Sixth Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Sonny Wilcox
783 F.2d 44 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)