United States v. Perry

25 F. App'x 420
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 7, 2002
DocketNo. 00-6220
StatusPublished

This text of 25 F. App'x 420 (United States v. Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Perry, 25 F. App'x 420 (6th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant-appellant, Colby Lee Perry, appeals the conviction and sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to attempting to manufacture methamphetamine and possessing equipment and chemicals used for the manufacture of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 843 and 846. In this appeal, the defen[421]*421dant contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress incriminating evidence seized from his residence by the police on August 31,1999 and October 5,1999.

The defendant’s motion to suppress was initially referred to a magistrate judge by the district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). In the magistrate’s Report and Recommendation, filed exceptions to the warrant requirement. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court upon the reasoning more fully set out in the magistrate’s report and recommendation dated January 10, 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prohibited acts C
21 U.S.C. § 843
§ 846
21 U.S.C. § 846

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 F. App'x 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-perry-ca6-2002.