United States v. Perez-Fulgencio

468 F. App'x 216
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 6, 2012·No. No. 12-6045·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carlos Perez-Fulgencio appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Perez-Fulgencio, No. 5:01-cr-30058-SGW-l (W.D.Va. Dec. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Perez-Fulgencio, 468 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2012).

468 F. App'x 216 (United States v. Perez-Fulgencio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related