United States v. Perez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 661 F.3d 189
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 30, 2009·No. 08-7073·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7073

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LUIS PEREZ, a/k/a Luis Quilson,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:04-cr-00057-JPB-JES-l)

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: April 30, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Luis Perez, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorneys, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Luis Perez appeals from the district court’s orders

denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c) (2006), and his motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Perez, No. 3:04-cr-00057-JPB-JES-l (N.D.W. Va. May 30,

2008; June 13, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Perez, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Perez (United States v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related