United States v. Pendergrass

167 F. App'x 343

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Pendergrass appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) and his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Pendergrass, No. CR-92-216-4 (D.S.C. filed Feb. 15, 2005, entered Feb. 16, 2005; filed and entered June 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED