United States v. Pemco Aeroplex, Inc.
This text of 166 F.3d 1311 (United States v. Pemco Aeroplex, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PUBLISH IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 97-6910 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________________ 07/06/99 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D.C. Docket No. 97-P-1300-S
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
PEMCO AEROPLEX, INC., a subsidiary of Precision Standard Company, a corporation,
Defendant-Appellee. _________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _________________________________________________________________
(Opinion February 8 , 1999, 166 F.3d 1311, 11th Cir., 1999)
(July 6, 1999)
Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on
whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of
the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a
rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court
en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 F.3d 1311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pemco-aeroplex-inc-ca11-1999.