United States v. Pearson

340 F. App'x 851

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Jackie Pearson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pearson, No. 4:98-cr-00015-LHT-1 (W.D.N.C. filed Mar. 26, 2009, entered Mar. 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.