United States v. Paz
This text of United States v. Paz (United States v. Paz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 20, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-40017 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JESUS RESENDEZ PAZ, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-57-2 ---------------------
Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges
BY THE COURT:
Jesus Resendez Paz, Jr. (“Resendez”), federal prisoner
# 55494-079, has filed an appeal from the district court’s denial
of his motion for transcripts at the government’s expense.
Resendez moves in this court for transcripts and for the
appointment of counsel.
Because Resendez does not have a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, or
any other action, pending in the district court, he is not
entitled to transcripts or to appointed counsel. See Walker v.
United States, 424 F.2d 278, 278-279 (5th Cir. 1970); Harless v.
United States, 329 F.2d 397, 398-399 (5th Cir. 1964). For the
same reasons, Resendez’s appeal of the district court’s denial of No. 03-40017 - 2 -
transcripts is without an arguable basis and is frivolous. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2; Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.
1983). Under Fifth Circuit Rule 42.2, an appeal will be
dismissed if it appears to the court, upon hearing of "any
interlocutory motion," that the appeal is frivolous and entirely
without merit. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED.
MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Paz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-paz-ca5-2003.