Jack Aaron Walker v. United States

424 F.2d 278, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9897
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 8, 1970
Docket28649
StatusPublished
Cited by38 cases

This text of 424 F.2d 278 (Jack Aaron Walker v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jack Aaron Walker v. United States, 424 F.2d 278, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9897 (5th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Walker, a federal prisoner, filed his motion in the District Court requesting a copy of his indictment and transcripts of his arraignment and sentencing. He has no appeal pending, nor has he filed or attempted to file a motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, or a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the District Court. The District Court denied the motion. We affirm. 1

Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2250 provides that only where a petitioner for the writ of habeas corpus has been granted leave *279 to proceed in forma pauperis and his application is pending before the court is that petitioner entitled to be furnished copies of court records without cost. Harless v. United States, 5 Cir. 1964, 329 F.2d 397. A federal prisoner is not entitled to obtain copies of court records at Government expense for the purpose of searching the record for possible error. Harless v. United States, supra; Culbert v. United States, 10 Cir. 1964, 325 F.2d 920; Ketcherside v. United States, 6 Cir. 1963, 317 F.2d 807.

The judgment below is

Affirmed.

1

. Pursuant to Rule IS of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F.2d 526; Part I.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McBride v. Guerrero
Fifth Circuit, 2026
Sanchez v. United States
N.D. Texas, 2022
SLUTZKER v. CAPOZZA
W.D. Pennsylvania, 2021
Jessie v. Huss
E.D. Michigan, 2020
United States v. Juan Alejandro Rodriguez Cuya
964 F.3d 969 (Eleventh Circuit, 2020)
Morris Tyler v. Leroy Cartledge
584 F. App'x 77 (Fourth Circuit, 2014)
United States v. Pablo Ramos-Barrera
466 F. App'x 334 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Hernandez
431 F. App'x 813 (Eleventh Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Driver
326 F. App'x 876 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Chance A. Jackson
302 F. App'x 122 (Third Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Raghunathan
288 F. App'x 2 (Third Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Peralta-Ramirez
266 F. App'x 360 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Agbomire
239 F. App'x 929 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Resendez Paz
72 F. App'x 233 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
424 F.2d 278, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jack-aaron-walker-v-united-states-ca5-1970.