United States v. Paul Silman
This text of 510 F. App'x 677 (United States v. Paul Silman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*678 MEMORANDUM **
Defendant Paul Andrew Silman appeals his sentence of 65 months incarceration followed by three years of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we need not recount them here.
In his plea agreement, Defendant validly waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182-83 (9th Cir.2000), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Rahman, 642 F.3d 1257, 1259 (9th Cir.2011). His arguments that the Government breached the plea agreement are meritless. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. United States v. Michlin, 34 F.3d 896, 898 (9th Cir.1994).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
510 F. App'x 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-paul-silman-ca9-2013.