United States v. Paul

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 19, 2011·No. 10-6868·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6868

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

XAVIER MARCELLUS PAUL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:98-cr-00192-JCC-4)

Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 19, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Xavier Marcellus Paul, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Xavier Marcellus Paul appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Paul, No. 1:98-cr-00192-JCC-4 (E.D. Va. June 10,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Paul, (4th Cir. 2011).

United States v. Paul (United States v. Paul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related