United States v. Patterson

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Patterson

293 F. App'x 212

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 17, 2008·No. No. 08-6983·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rael Rashard Patterson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Patterson, No. 6:97-cr-00129-GRA-l, 2008 WL 2330565 (D.S.C. June 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Rael Rashard Patterson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Patterson, No. 6:97-cr-00129-GRA-l, 2008 WL 2330565 (D.S.C. June 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Patterson, 293 F. App'x 212 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

293 F. App'x 212 (United States v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related