United States v. Patterson

169 F. App'x 788
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 6, 2006
Docket04-4992
StatusUnpublished

This text of 169 F. App'x 788 (United States v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Patterson, 169 F. App'x 788 (4th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tyrick Patterson pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000). Initially, the district court overruled Patterson’s objections to the guideline calculation based on Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and sentenced him to a term of twenty-one months imprisonment. On appeal, Patterson argued that, the district court erred in imposing sentence under a mandatory guideline scheme. Without filing a brief, the government moved to vacate the sentence and remand the case to the district court for resentencing in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). We granted the motion and Patterson was resentenced to a term of nineteen months imprisonment. Patterson has not identified any error in the sentence imposed on remand.

We therefore affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blakely v. Washington
542 U.S. 296 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 F. App'x 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-patterson-ca4-2006.