United States v. Patricia Calhoun Cass
This text of United States v. Patricia Calhoun Cass (United States v. Patricia Calhoun Cass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 07-14606 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FEBRUARY 26, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN ________________________ CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 07-00035-CR-1-LSC-JEO
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PATRICIA CALHOUN CASS, a.k.a. Susan Jones, a.k.a. Patty Cass, a.k.a. Patricia Calhoun, PAUL ANTHONY CASS, a.k.a. Brown, Defendants-Appellants.
________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _________________________
(February 26, 2009)
Before BLACK, CARNES and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Everett W. Wess, appointed counsel for Patricia Calhoun Cass in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record confirms there are no issues of arguable merit on
appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Patricia
Cass’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Patricia Calhoun Cass, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-patricia-calhoun-cass-ca11-2009.