United States v. Cass

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Cass

315 F. App'x 869

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 26, 2009·No. No. 07-14606·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Everett W. Wess, appointed counsel for Patricia Calhoun Cass in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Patricia Cass’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Everett W. Wess, appointed counsel for Patricia Calhoun Cass in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Patricia Cass’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Cass, 315 F. App'x 869 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

315 F. App'x 869 (United States v. Cass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related