United States v. Pasoquen

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 6, 2010·No. 10-6600·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6600

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JEREMY PASOQUEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (2:05-cr-00637-DCN-1)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 6, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeremy Pasoquen, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Thomas Phillips, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jeremy Pasoquen appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Pasoquen, No. 2:05-cr-00637-DCN-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 13, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Pasoquen, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Pasoquen (United States v. Pasoquen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related