United States v. Parra-Sotelo

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2005·No. 04-40991·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 21, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-40991 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JORGE PARRA-SOTELO,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-36-1 --------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jorge Parra-Sotelo pleaded guilty to possession with intent

to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine and was

sentenced to 120 months of imprisonment, five years of supervised

release, and a $200 fine. Parra-Sotelo argues for the first time

on appeal that the statute of conviction, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a),

(b), is unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S.

466 (2000). Parra-Sotelo’s appeal waiver does not bar review of

this issue because he did not waive his right to appeal his

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 04-40991 -2-

conviction. Nevertheless, as he concedes, this issue is

foreclosed. See United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582

(5th Cir. 2000).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Parra-Sotelo, (5th Cir. 2005).

United States v. Parra-Sotelo (United States v. Parra-Sotelo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)