United States v. Parra-Sotelo
This text of United States v. Parra-Sotelo (United States v. Parra-Sotelo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 21, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-40991 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JORGE PARRA-SOTELO,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-36-1 --------------------
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jorge Parra-Sotelo pleaded guilty to possession with intent
to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine and was
sentenced to 120 months of imprisonment, five years of supervised
release, and a $200 fine. Parra-Sotelo argues for the first time
on appeal that the statute of conviction, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a),
(b), is unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S.
466 (2000). Parra-Sotelo’s appeal waiver does not bar review of
this issue because he did not waive his right to appeal his
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 04-40991 -2-
conviction. Nevertheless, as he concedes, this issue is
foreclosed. See United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582
(5th Cir. 2000).
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Parra-Sotelo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-parra-sotelo-ca5-2005.