United States v. Parker

334 F. App'x 713
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 20, 2009
Docket08-30696
StatusUnpublished

This text of 334 F. App'x 713 (United States v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Parker, 334 F. App'x 713 (5th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Derrick DeCarlo Parker, federal prisoner # 10876-035, appeals the sentence imposed following the district court’s granting of his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Parker argues that the holding in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), applies in § 3582(c)(2) proceedings and that the district court abused its discretion by not imposing a sentence below the amended guidelines sentence range. Parker also argues that the district court committed procedural error by not giving reasons for not granting a greater sentence reduction and by not making an individualized sentencing determination.

Parker’s assertions that Booker applies in § 3582(c)(2) proceedings and that the district court abused its discretion by not imposing a sentence below the amended guidelines sentence range are foreclosed by United States v. Doublin, 572 F.3d 235, 236-39 (5th Cir.2009), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 21, 2009) (No. 09-6657). As the district court sentenced Parker to the lowest sentence within the amended guidelines sentence range and did not have authority to lower Parker’s sentence further, see id., any procedural error alleged by Parker was harmless. See United States v. Sandle, 123 F.3d 809, 812-13 (5th Cir.1997).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Sandle
123 F.3d 809 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Doublin
572 F.3d 235 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
334 F. App'x 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-parker-ca5-2009.