United States v. Parker

239 F. App'x 96
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Parker. Read the opinion of the Court — 505 F.3d 323
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 5, 2007·No. 05-20054·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Victor Parker has renewed his motion for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Parker has not filed a response. Counsel avers that Parker has served his term of incarceration and is not being supervised. Based on our review of the record and counsel’s representations, we conclude that there is no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See United States v. Clark, 193 F.3d 845, 847-48 (5th Cir.1999). Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Parker, 239 F. App'x 96 (5th Cir. 2007).

239 F. App'x 96 (United States v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Clark
193 F.3d 845 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)