United States v. Pacimeo

Second Circuit

United States v. Pacimeo

317 F.2d 75

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 8, 1963·No. No. 377, Docket 27809·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Pacimeo’s conviction in open court. The claims of error in regard to the prosecutor’s reference in summation to an exhibit which, although the subject of examination, had not been offered in evidence, and the receipt in evidence of a transcript of an interview between defendant and an Assistant United States Attorney when, it is alleged, the Assistant and his stenographer had or could have had their recollection sufficiently refreshed, fail, among other reasons, because of 28 U.S.C. § 2111. Appellant’s other points are wholly without merit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Pacimeo’s conviction in open court. The claims of error in regard to the prosecutor’s reference in summation to an exhibit which, although the subject of examination, had not been offered in evidence, and the receipt in evidence of a transcript of an interview between defendant and an Assistant United States Attorney when, it is alleged, the Assistant and his stenographer had or could have had their recollection sufficiently refreshed, fail, among other reasons, because of 28 U.S.C. § 2111. Appellant’s other points are wholly without merit.

United States v. Pacimeo, 317 F.2d 75 (2d Cir. 1963).

Pincite

317 F.2d 75 (United States v. Pacimeo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related