United States v. Pabon

Second Circuit

United States v. Pabon

387 F.2d 351

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedDecember 6, 1967

DocketNo. 222, Docket 31367

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 387 F.2d 351 (United States v. Pabon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Pabon, 387 F.2d 351 (2d Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After a jury trial appellant was convicted of having violated 21 U.S.C. §§ 173, 174. Though no objection was made below, appellant requests us to hold that the method federal agents followed in entering premises where appellant and others were found processing narcotics was “plain error” within the meaning of Rule 52(b) Fed.R.Crim.P. inasmuch as appellant claims the entry violated 18 U.S.C. § 3109 and the Fourth Amendment.

We find no reversible error and affirm the judgment of conviction entered upon the jury verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

After a jury trial appellant was convicted of having violated 21 U.S.C. §§ 173, 174. Though no objection was made below, appellant requests us to hold that the method federal agents followed in entering premises where appellant and others were found processing narcotics was “plain error” within the meaning of Rule 52(b) Fed.R.Crim.P. inasmuch as appellant claims the entry violated 18 U.S.C. § 3109 and the Fourth Amendment.

We find no reversible error and affirm the judgment of conviction entered upon the jury verdict.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

387 F.2d 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pabon-ca2-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack