United States v. Miguel Pabon
This text of 387 F.2d 351 (United States v. Miguel Pabon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Miguel PABON, Appellant.
No. 222, Docket 31367.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 5, 1967.
Decided Dec. 6, 1967.
Michael W. Leisure, Pierre N. Leval, Asst. U.S. Attys., Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., for appellee.
Joshua N. Koplovitz, Anthony F. Marra, New York City, for appellant.
Before WATERMAN, MOORE and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
After a jury trial appellant was convicted of having violated 21 U.S.C. 173, 174. Though no objection was made below, appellant requests us to hold that the method federal agents followed in entering premises where appellant and others were found processing narcotics was 'plain error' within the meaning of Rule 52(b) Fed.R.Crim.P. inasmuch as appellant claims the entry violated 18 U.S.C. 3109 and the Fourth Amendment.
We find no reversible error and affirm the judgment of conviction entered upon the jury verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
387 F.2d 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-miguel-pabon-ca2-1967.